NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 5 WITHOUT BRAND
Clinical Case: NeoGen® PTFE Membran

Vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration

in atrophic posterior mandible using a non-absorbable PTFE membrane with titanium reinforcement.

 

Dr. Javier Mayor Arenal
Specialist in oral surgery, implantology and periodontics
Madrid, Spain 

Facts

Patient:

A 55-year-old woman with no relevant medical history.

Clinical problem:

The patient had peri-implantitis in implant 36, with symptoms of pain and suppuration in the area. She wanted a definitive solution, and was prescribed implant explantation treatment, and then regeneration of the resulting defect, so that a new implant could be placed and surrounded by bone.

Clinical solution:

We performed vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration in the defect area using a titanium-reinforced PTFE membrane, adding approximately 90% autogenous bone with 10 to 15% xenograft of porcine hydroxyapatite. After maturation of the bone graft, we placed the implant 36 again, surrounded by bone.

Treatment plan:
  • Perform vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration.
  • Use a NeoGen PTFE Non-absorbable membrane with titanium reinforcement for bone augmentation.
  • Wait for new bone formation over a period of 9 to 12 months.
  • Perform reentry into bone regeneration, removing the membrane, taking a bone cylinder (biopsy) to perform a histomorphometric analysis of the regenerated bone tissue, and place an implant in position 36 (the patient did not want to place implant 37).
  • After 3 months, we performed soft tissue surgery to gain keratinized mucosa inserted into the implant area 36.
  • After 3 months, we connected a healing device to implant 36.
  • Subsequently, we placed the final rehabilitation on implant 36.
Products:

1 NeoGen Ti-Reinforced PTFE Membrane.

Conclusion:

Guided vertical and horizontal bone regeneration is a predictable and effective technique, provided that an appropriate work protocol is applied and quality biomaterials are used, which provide us with adequate maintenance of the space for a sufficient period of time, so that it is occupied by the newly formed bone, achieving regeneration of the defect, and obtaining vascularized and compact bone regeneration, which allows us to place the implants and their prosthetic rehabilitation.

step by step

step by step

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 1 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 1.

    Panoramic X-ray showing peri-implantitis in the lower implants. Below on the left we see in more detail the bone loss in implant 36 due to peri-implantitis and on the right we see the bone defect resulting from its explantation.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 2 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 2.

    Clinical situation of healed hard and soft tissues after implant explantation 36

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 3 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 3.

    Bone defect after elevating the mucoperiosteal flap. We made an incision in the center of the crest and scalloped intrasulcularly 3 teeth beyond the defect (avoiding making discharges where there were crowns), finally we made a vertical discharge incision at the anterior limit of the flap.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 4 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 4.

    We perform cortical perforations to promote vascularization and osteogenesis in the bone graft.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 5 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 5.

    We stabilize the NeoGen Ti-Reinforced PTFE Membrane, starting to fix it from the lingual and incorporating an autogenous graft into the defect in approximately 90% proportion, so that together with the extraordinary maintenance of space provided by this membrane, we achieve adequate new bone formation.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 6 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 6.

    We also fix the membrane by the vestibular side, achieving adequate stability of the same on the bone defect.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 7 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 7.

    Summary of membrane manipulation and bone grafting, until obtaining compact and stable regeneration.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 8 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 8.

    Tension-free primary closure through correct management of the lingual and vestibular flaps and appropriate periosteal incisions, together with the application of simple horizontal mattress sutures.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 9 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 9.

    Clinical and radiographic status of the regenerated area after 10 months of healing.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 10 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 10.

    Re-entry into bone regeneration after 10 months (after removing the membrane), achieving a compact and vascularized newly formed bone, where we will place implant 36.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 11 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 11.

    Re-entry into regeneration at 10 months. Before and after comparison, after performing GBR with NeoGen Ti-Reinforced PTFE Membrane in the defect area.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 12 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 12.

    Placement of implant 36 on the newly formed bone (occlusal view), we also performed a histomorphometric analysis of the bone tissue, obtaining 40% of vital bone.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 13 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 13.

    We performed surgery on soft tissues to gain inserted keratinized mucosa, using a free connective epithelium graft in the regenerated area, with a crestal and apical strip.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 14 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 14.

    Application of tissue adhesive on the free connective epithelial graft to improve its stabilization, because it is an area where free gingival grafts usually have a worse prognosis and/or greater contraction, largely due to the relationship of this area with the origin of the buccinator muscle.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 15 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 15.

    Free gingival graft in the maturation phase before connecting the healing abutment, and subsequently placing the rehabilitation on the implant 36.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 16 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 16.

    Comparison between the initial state of the defect in the 3rd quadrant and the gain of hard and soft tissues.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 17 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 17.

    Rehabilitation placed on implant 36, with stable tissues around it and with a satisfactory aesthetic and functional result.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 18 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 18.

    Comparison between the initial state of the defect and the gain in hard and soft tissues with the rehabilitation in place.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 19 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 19.

    Periapical radiograph where we observe the gain in bone tissue in relation to the initial state.

  • NEOSS CASE - FIGURE 20 WITHOUT BRAND
    Figure 20.

    Panoramic X-ray one year after placing the rehabilitation on implant 36, where the gain in bone tissue in relation to the initial state and its stability can be observed.

"NeoGen membranes are specially designed to regenerate large three-dimensional bone volumes in a predictable way, thanks to their double PTFE texture and their great capacity to maintain space, due to the great rigidity of their titanium mesh, providing the appropriate conditions for effective bone neoformation.“

Downloads

Downloads